Bitcoin has a low risk of collapse Unlike traditional currencies that rely on authorities. When currencies collapse, it contributes to hyperinflation or the wipeout of one’s savings in a minute. Bitcoin exchange rate isn’t controlled by any government and is a digital currency available worldwide.
Bitcoin is easy to carry. A billion Dollars in the Bitcoin can be stored on a memory stick and placed in one’s pocket. It’s so simple to transfer Bitcoins compared to paper cash.
The general Notion is that Bitcoins ‘ are ‘mined’… intriguing term here… by solving an increasingly hard mathematical formula -more difficult as more Bitcoins are ‘mined’ into existence; again interesting- to a computer. Once established, the new Bitcoin is put into a digital ‘wallet’. It’s then possible to exchange actual goods or Fiat money for Bitcoins… and vice versa. Furthermore, since there is no central issuer of Bitcoins, it’s all highly distributed, hence resistant to being ‘handled’ by authority.
Naturally proponents of Bitcoin, Those who profit from the growth of Bitcoin, insist rather loudly that ‘for sure, Bitcoin is cash’… and not only that, but ‘it is the best money ever, the money of their future’, etc.. . The proponents of Fiat shout just as loudly that paper currency is cash… and most of us know that Fiat paper isn’t money by any means, as it lacks the main attributes of genuine money. The question then is does Bitcoin even be eligible as cash… not mind that it being the money of their future, or the best money .
Compared to Fiat, Bitcoin does not Do too badly as a medium of exchange. Fiat is only accepted in the geographic domain of its issuer. Dollars aren’t any great in Europe etc.. Bitcoin is approved internationally. On the flip side, very few retailers currently accept payment in Bitcoin. Until the acceptance grows geometrically, Fiat wins… although at the cost of trade between nations.
The first condition is that a lot Tougher; cash must be a stable store of value… now Bitcoins have gone from a ‘value’ of $3.00 to about $1,000, in just a few years. That is about as far from being a ‘stable store of value’; as you can buy! Truly, such profits are a perfect illustration of a speculative boom… like Dutch tulip bulbs, or real mining companies, or Nortel stocks. Ideally, just as with so many other aspects regarding bitcoin revolution software, you will need to pay more consideration to some things than others.
But that can vary slightly, and it really just will depend on how you want to use the information. But we are not finished, yet, and there is always much more to be uncovered. Yet have more big pieces of the total picture to present to you, though. Even following what is next, we will not quit there because the very best is yet to come.
Naturally, Fiat fails as well; For example, the US Dollar, the ‘primary’ Fiat, has dropped over 95 percent of its value in a few decades… neither fiat nor Bitcoin qualify at the most important measure of money; the capacity to store value and preserve value through time. Actual money, that is Gold, has shown the capacity to maintain value not just for centuries, except for eons. Neither Fiat nor Bitcoin has this crucial capacity… both neglect as cash.
Finally, we return to the next Feature; that of being the numeraire. Now this is actually interesting, and we can see why both Bitcoin and Fiat neglect as money, by looking closely at the question of their ‘numeraire’. Numeraire refers to the usage of cash to not just save value, but to at a sense measure, or compare worth. In Austrian economics, it’s deemed impossible to really measure value; after all, value resides only in human comprehension… and how can anything else in understanding really be quantified? But through the principle of Mengerian market action, that’s interaction between offer and bid, market prices can be established… if just briefly… and this industry price is expressed in terms of the numeraire, the most marketable good, that’s money.
So how do we set the value of Fiat… ? Through the idea of ‘buying power’… which is, the worth of Fiat depends upon what it can be traded for… a so called ‘basket of goods’. But his clearly suggests that Fiat has no value of its own, instead value flows from the worth of the goods and services it may be traded for. Causality flows from the merchandise ‘bought’ into the Fiat number. After all, what difference is there between a 1 Dollar invoice and a trillion Dollar invoice, except that the amount printed on it… along with the buying power of the number?